It's only a week to Halloween, which means it's time to get back to writing! (I'm not sure why it means that, but I hope we can both agree that it does.)
I attended the 7th annual Connecting for Change this weekend, a Bioneers by the Bay conference hosted by the wonderful Marion Institute. Though my biggest highlight of the weekend was seeing all the friendly faces of the fantastic Marion Institute staff and getting to see my lovely former NCCC housemate as her current team helped run the conference (she's now a team leader and spends lots of time making sure they all stay happy and alive), I also loved the conference itself. The keynotes were engaging and compelling; the workshops left me feeling empowered and change-y. (Can we also agree that 'change-y' is a word or would that be too much to ask?) It was a good weekend.
One of the speakers at the conference was Ben Hewitt, a native Vermonter and the author of 'The Town that Food Saved.' Among other topics, he spoke of how Americans on average spend 9.5% of our salaries on food and have the persisting perception that food should be cheap. He proclaimed, "Food should NOT
be cheap! It's the most important thing you put in your body. ...It should NOT be cheap." This got me thinking. As part of my AmeriVentures, I've been attempting to stick close to my food stamps. By keeping my food budget close to $200 per month, I've endeavored to get some sense of what it's like to live on food stamps. The venture is falsely constructed, as I miss out on some of the primary emotions of living off food stamps: the fear that comes as that balance nears zero and the days of waiting for the exact moment when money will be added to the card. Instead, I calmly calculate how far over I went in the first two weeks with my plethora of fresh fruits and vegetables and attempt to limit myself with kitchen creativity in the last two weeks of each month.
The experiment is over. I attended the conference with a fellow VISTA (yet another AmeriFriend involved in change-yness) and we talked about the cost of food during our three-hour drive back from southeastern Massachusetts to southwestern Connecticut. She pointed out that we often talk about wanting everyone to have access to fresh produce or wanting everyone to have access to organic foods, but leave ourselves out of the equation. There are positives to spending in solidarity with those who don't have access; there are also positives to using the access I do have, to spending my money on fresh and organic foods and let it speak for my values in a way. Money talks, it seems.
As a result of all this conferencing and thinking, I've decided to readjust my budget to allow me to buy more fresh fruits and vegetables and, going a bit towards the other extreme, to buy more organic foods. I attended a workshop this weekend at which a doctor discussed just how far up the food chain we humans are - environment --> plants --> herbivores --> omnivores/carnivores (incl. humans) --> babies - and what that means for the concentration of toxins in our foods. This got me thinking about those pesticide sprayings any one pepper or zucchini may have had in its life. Wouldn't it be nice to eat a vegetable that hadn't been coated with chemicals 10 times over?
I thought this would indeed be nice, so I went to Stop & Shop (the Fairfield branch; I already adjusted my grocery shopping location when I found early on that a) this one is right on the way home from work rather than past my turn, and b) this one targets a different demographic and that demographic is admittedly much closer to my own, preferring local apples and whole grains to chips and bread for the focal displays). I picked up what organic vegetables I could find beyond leafy greens (an eggplant and a bag of carrots) and some local apples then headed over to Whole Foods, got lots more organic vegetables, and headed home to a delicious dinner of tilapia, kale, mashed butternut squash, and a wheat roll (made locally without sugar). I spent much more money than I would have on this same trip before the weekend, but I ended up with an amazing meal that made me happy. I'll take that.
You, lovely reader, get the next step of my research into this is issue. I found some interesting data as I was looking up the 9.5% statistic online to make sure I was remembering accurately. The statistic was accurate...back in 2004. The USDA puts 2009 US expenditures on food consumed at home just under 7%. By comparison, citizens in Spain, France, and Italy (all of which, I must attest, have fantastic food and a wonderful food culture) spend about 14% of their income on food to be consumed at home. The USDA survey looked at 168 countries and found that people living in the United States commit the smallest percent of our expenditures to our food choices:
every other one of the 168 nations commits a greater percentage. It's not surprising that Jordan, Indonesia, and Pakistan all top 40% in spending on food - Azerbaijan is at the extreme with 46.9% of household final income expenditures spent on food that was consumed at home. It does, however, provide a pretty stark image of the shift away from meals eaten in the household and suggests that perhaps there are greater points of concern than food not being cheap enough for the average American. As Ben Hewitt said, "Food should NOT
be cheap! It's the most important thing you put in your body. ...It should NOT be cheap."
I'm off to do change-y things. Enjoy a crisp apple or other healthy fall treat this week!